
02-13-2005, 12:39 PM
|
 |
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LixyChick
It took an ammendment for free speech to be guaranteed, Belial...because our constitution was intended to be spelled out by the people, for the people...in order for EVERYONE to be able to receive the exact kind of treatment as the next person. No one person was exempt because of race, creed, color or political affiliation. Because we were founded as a nation for all to join if they chose to...we are a melting pot of many nations...all with different policies and politics. If only the FCC would spell out it's rules as well as our constitution does. And yes, it's been tilted and twisted and tweeked through the years to ammend and update it...but freedom of speech has always meant what it was spelled out to mean!
*hugs to you all*
|
Actually it took an ammendment because our Constitution was NOT written to be all inclusive but there were a number of representatives who had only agreed to sign if a Bill of Rights would be later added and they continued to push. http://www.billofrights.com/
|

02-13-2005, 12:42 PM
|
 |
Everybody Stretch!
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pa. USA
Posts: 11,637
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lilith
Actually it took an ammendment because our Constitution was NOT written to be all inclusive but there were a number of representatives who had only agreed to sign if a Bill of Rights would be later added and they continued to push. http://www.billofrights.com/
|
Thanks Lil! That's surely what I meant!
__________________
Minds are like parachutes. They only work when they are open.
~Thomas Dewar~
|

02-13-2005, 12:49 PM
|
 |
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
|
|
Thank all that is good, for the revolution and evolution 
|

02-13-2005, 01:12 PM
|
 |
Everybody Stretch!
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pa. USA
Posts: 11,637
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fzzy
... or much like the thought that we have freedom of action here, just so long as you don't harm someone else in your actions .... freedom of speech is only guaranteed so long as you don't harm someone else in the process, then it becomes either a matter of the "state" litigating or an individual litigating. (since we are an international site, I'm not sure that all would have that understanding when they hear the phrase). 
|
See fzzy? This is precisely my point! Where is the proof of harm? What are the EXACT guidelines? Who do they, and don't they, apply to and in what context? Where is Howard's day in court? They won't even let him ask them to prove their point in litigation. At their whim (for lack of a better word) they have said...and I quote Michael Powell..."We'll know it when we hear it". Which, to me, means...if we don't like the context of what you are saying, we will fine you up the wazzoo. And...it could have been ok yesterday, but it might not sit right with us today...so you'd better put your psychic thinking cap on and say nothing that we MIGHT feel is indecent today! How can the FCC say that what one person says is indecent...and when spoken by another it isn't? Either it is or it isn't! A word is a word is a word! Masturbation can mean nothing more than masturbation! And it shouldn't be left to a small group of people to get their panties in a bunch over something one person says just because they don't like his show content! It's not like Howard has just recently gotten sexual in content...he's been the same personality all along. They should be made to spell it out and adhere to it for everyone. But...they won't give him a day in court! Ergo my reason for previously stating that the FCC imposes arbitrary fines without having to answer to anyone! No one non-elected organization should have half the power that the FCC is now demonstrating. It's ludicrous and goes against all that this country was built on!
__________________
Minds are like parachutes. They only work when they are open.
~Thomas Dewar~
|

02-14-2005, 05:11 AM
|
I make sexytime with you
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,616
|
|
My quote, Lixy, is from George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" sketch 
__________________
I want to know everything
I want to be everywhere
I want to fuck everyone in the world
I want to do something that matters
|

02-14-2005, 05:23 AM
|
 |
Everybody Stretch!
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pa. USA
Posts: 11,637
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belial
My quote, Lixy, is from George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" sketch 
|
Damn Belial...do you know how long it's been since I actually heard that? Let's just say it hasn't been in the last ten years (way longer than that)!
LOL!
__________________
Minds are like parachutes. They only work when they are open.
~Thomas Dewar~
|

02-14-2005, 06:19 AM
|
Learning to talk sexy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,264
|
|
OK ... first of all ... from my own personal "nails on the chalkboard" thing.... amendment only has one "m" in the beginning ...... OK sorry, just had to get that off my chest
Want to make it plain that I have not stated an opinion on this matter, just clarified how the 1st amendment has been interpreted by the courts. I personally have only spent a few minutes here or there viewing Howard Stern in any forum he presents himself in because I find the man's public personae to be crass and pre-pubescent (ok here's the problem with correcting spelling, when you then spell words that you're not sure how to spell)
On the other hand, I've never written a letter to anyone about it either. I'm in the numbers of those who basically ignore him and will be perfectly happy when he moves to his new venue. I also don't necessarily believe that the "attack" will turn to others ... it may or may not, that can only be known at a later date.
From my perspective, I think that there is a difference in presentation of certain words ... just as we've commented before about discussion of certain topics here on Pixies not being ok, but are ok on other sites ... the last one I remember of concern was a discussion about breastfeeding that a short term member wanted to do a poll on .... he mentioned it was perfectly fine on a parenthood board but was banned here .... content of the program can be important IMHO when making such decisions.
|

02-14-2005, 06:33 AM
|
 |
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
|
|
1) I missed amendment twice on the same Social Studies content exam cause it should have two MMMMMMs damn it (so says me...fuck Webster)
2) Breastfeeding itself was not the issue...it had something to do with minors. It was about the content not the topic.
|

02-14-2005, 06:36 AM
|
Learning to talk sexy
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,264
|
|
thanks for clarifying that Lil .... I knew that it had to do with minors .... but others may not know that ... as always, you're the best! (and we can submit the "corrected" spelling to Websters ... let them know they've made a grave error!!!)
|

02-14-2005, 06:39 AM
|
 |
♦*♥Moderatrix♥*♦
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: on top of it all
Posts: 50,568
|
|
Seriously...I got like 48 out of 50 points because the woman took off both times....grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
|

02-15-2005, 06:16 AM
|
 |
Everybody Stretch!
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Pa. USA
Posts: 11,637
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fzzy
OK ... first of all ... from my own personal "nails on the chalkboard" thing.... amendment only has one "m" in the beginning ...... OK sorry, just had to get that off my chest
Want to make it plain that I have not stated an opinion on this matter, just clarified how the 1st amendment has been interpreted by the courts. I personally have only spent a few minutes here or there viewing Howard Stern in any forum he presents himself in because I find the man's public personae to be crass and pre-pubescent (ok here's the problem with correcting spelling, when you then spell words that you're not sure how to spell)
On the other hand, I've never written a letter to anyone about it either. I'm in the numbers of those who basically ignore him and will be perfectly happy when he moves to his new venue. I also don't necessarily believe that the "attack" will turn to others ... it may or may not, that can only be known at a later date.
From my perspective, I think that there is a difference in presentation of certain words ... just as we've commented before about discussion of certain topics here on Pixies not being ok, but are ok on other sites ... the last one I remember of concern was a discussion about breastfeeding that a short term member wanted to do a poll on .... he mentioned it was perfectly fine on a parenthood board but was banned here .... content of the program can be important IMHO when making such decisions.
|
I hear ya...about the spelling thing fzzy! When I type on this thing and reread my words...most of them don't look correct...lol! It's annoying and I know it and I'm sorry! I know I'll never make the "amendment" mistake again though...so TY!
As to the Stern show content and presentation...I totally understand what you are saying about how one person can say something in one context and another can say the same thing in a totally different way, but did you understand me when I explained that Howard's content has ALWAYS been the same?
I'm not trying to make a case and sway opinions for Howard Stern here. He is just a perfect example of the climate of what the FCC and the governing powers are up to these days. There have been other radio jocks who have actually been ousted from their jobs recently, for being even more shocking than Howard. So...he is not the only focus of the FCC, but he is a major one!
I'll say it again...Clear Channel carried Howard's show for many years and defended his right to keep his content on many occasions. Suddenly, one day they fired the show from all of their stations with no warning and only stated that his content was the reason. He is not being paid in fulfilling his contract...even though it is an iron clad one and, yes, he is taking Clear Channel to task in litigation for it. Then the FCC aquired Michael Powell as it's head. This is a man who, on several occasions, has spoken out in favor of freedom of speech in a way that would have left Howard unscathed...till he was appointed to the FCC. Then he flip-flopped his reasonings and began fining Infinity Broadcasting for the complaints it received for the Stern show. He stated that hundreds of complaints were received, but failed to mention (till the records were checked) that these hundreds of complaints came from a handful of people...literally! The fines were high at first, but Infinity paid them none the less. Then the threat of fining individuals for each and every indescretion was tabled and discussed. This included past shows that had already aired "as is". So each show had to be re-edited for airing for the "Best Of" shows when the cast of the Stern show is on vacation. But, because the FCC hasn't clearly and concisely defined indecency, but "will know it when they hear it"...the old shows can be fined over and over and over again for words that aired the last times it was aired but wasn't sited. So, if a show is used three times (for example) and the content has been censored each time...the very next time it is aired, it can be fined again for something new that the FCC suddenly feels is indecent.
In all honesty...all Howard wants is a day in court with the FCC in order for them to define indecency. This won't help him now. But those left behind on commercial radio will need this definition in order to play by the FCC's rules and it would behoove the braodcaster's in all media venues to make certain it comes to fruition...and stop this downward spiral before it gets even more out of hand!
If it's left up to the FCC, as it is now, they have petitioned to have their meetings and results kept behind closed doors...which is against some law (that I can never remember the name of)...and quite frankly, a really bizarre request for an organization that is suppose to be in the forefront of helping people keep this country "moral"!!!!!!
Oops...running late...gotta go!
__________________
Minds are like parachutes. They only work when they are open.
~Thomas Dewar~
|

02-15-2005, 11:19 AM
|
AMF's Master
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 40
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakritze
Find out who supports large corporations over individual liberties,declares war to occupy another country,wants to narrow the wall that divides church and state and regulate what goes on in our bedrooms. Steer clear from these bastards.
|
I'd agree with much of that, just not all. Individual liberty is good, but so is economic freedom. I want to keep government off my back, out of my pocket, and out of my bedroom, unless of course, by government, you mean some cute intern. :devilish:
__________________
"There are no moral phenomena at all, only a moral interpretation of phenomena."- Friedrich Nietzsche
|

02-15-2005, 12:24 PM
|
 |
watchin you wiggle
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: east coast
Posts: 1,171
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LixyChick
Damn Belial...do you know how long it's been since I actually heard that? Let's just say it hasn't been in the last ten years (way longer than that)!
LOL!
|
tater  and cheese  and nacho  bet you can't eat just one!!!
i love the discussions keep em coming  hey guys bring in the stuff ....wanna move over a little ....... 
|

02-15-2005, 04:26 PM
|
 |
pixie of the wood
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,575
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LixyChick
If it's left up to the FCC, as it is now, they have petitioned to have their meetings and results kept behind closed doors...which is against some law (that I can never remember the name of)...!
|
i think what you mean are the open meeting laws but i believe they apply only to agencies. in pa we have the sunshine act... also applies to agencies....could be federal as well but i'm not certain.
*thinking she didn't know much about it after all * lol
|

02-15-2005, 05:40 PM
|
 |
is not this trim anymore!
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 21,709
|
|
I think we should settle this with a winner takes all game of Anal Ring Toss. 
__________________
Though I am different from you,
We were born involved in one another.
For it was not into my ear you whispered, but into my heart. It was not my lips you kissed, but my soul.
Complete surrender should not just come at moments in which one faces overwhelming odds, but in the calm when it seems one is personally in complete control of one's life.
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.
|