The intended labyrinth of law is not my field of proficiency, but after seeing what the practitioners have done with it, I warrant my say.

Oranges and apples here I believe.

The intent of confronting your accusers is to prevent a system from presenting unsubstantiated charges. It is part and parcel with the requirement of having to prove guilt, not for the defendant to prove innocence……….. even if it doesn’t always happen that way.

In practice, it would be difficult to present detailed facts without identifying a celebrity. After all, that is the definition of “celebrity”. A person recognized by the public for some reason.

The topic here is that the fame of the person often tilts the judicial scales, in either direction, for whatever reason. It seems Law and Process are seldom synonymous with Justice.

I.e. Mike Tyson / O. J. Simpson

__________________